Home » Health News »
Cancer: Establishing metastasis
Sometimes negative results can point researchers in the right direction.
In results published in PLOS ONE on September 4, 2018, scientists at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) examined a protein called vaccinia-related kinase 1 (VRK1) that they hypothesized was important for metastasis. They found that, rather than causing cancer cells to migrate and invade, VRK1 over-expression had the opposite effect.
Yet this behavior could well help cancer to establish itself in new parts of the body, according to study director and Hirschmann Endowed Professor Paula Traktman, Ph.D., in the MUSC Hollings Cancer Center.
Traktman and graduate student Aye M. Mon started with the idea that high levels of VRK1 might be associated with breast cancer. Other research had suggested this, and Traktman’s own work had revealed that depleting VRK1 caused cells to grow more slowly and to cause smaller tumors and fewer metastases in mice. Drawing on these results, Mon and Traktman wanted to see how cells would grow when VRK1 was over-expressed. “The logic was that, if we over-express VRK1, maybe the cells would grow faster and maybe they would be invasive and migratory and contribute to metastasis,” said Traktman.
To their surprise, they found that the opposite was true. When they over-expressed VRK1 in mammary epithelial cells growing in tissue culture dishes, those cells did not grow more rapidly than cells with normal levels of VRK1. And, contrary to their hypothesis, the cells tended to migrate and invade much more slowly. But, when the VRK1 over-expressors were cultured under 3D conditions that mimic tissues, they grew more rapidly and established larger colonies. Intrigued, Mon and Traktman took a closer look at the characteristics of these cells. They examined a hallmark of cancer cells known as epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, or EMT. Many cells undergo EMT on their way to becoming cancer cells. The transition enables them to migrate away from the tumor.
They observed that the cells with high levels of VRK1 were more apt to form cell-to-cell connections and had lower levels of mesenchymal markers that are often present in cancer cells. Rather, the cells seemed to undergo the opposite transition, from mesenchymal to epithelial. The cells were much less likely to migrate.
These negative results pointed the researchers in a new direction. If high levels of VRK1 caused cancer cells to migrate more slowly, perhaps VRK1 was necessary to enable cells to colonize a new area of the body. In such a process, cancer cells spreading throughout the body would need to abandon the characteristics that make them spread and adopt the traits of cells that would anchor them in place. It is that kind of behavior that allows metastases to begin growing in other parts of the body.
To confirm their new hypothesis, Traktman and Mon teamed up with pathologist A. C. McKinnon at the Medical College of Wisconsin. McKinnon provided the team with cells from breast cancer patients who had metastases to their lymph nodes. They found much higher levels of VRK1 in the lymph node metastases than in the primary tumor cells. In addition, they examined the expression levels of VRK1 in public databases of breast cancer and found that high levels of VRK1 were associated with the most aggressive cancers. Such high levels were also associated with the worst prognoses in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Traktman summarizes the process. “For a tumor to be aggressive, some of the cells have to break off of the primary tumor and invade through the surface and into the bloodstream and then out of the bloodstream and find a new site,” said Traktman. “In order to form a metastasis in a new area, the cells have to stop being wanderers and colonize.” And it is possible that VRK1 over-expression enables such cancer cells to colonize new sites in the body.
Traktman and Mon suspect that this finding may extend to other types of cancer, such as brain cancer and liver cancer. In fact, high levels of VRK1 are found in certain types of liver cancer. These results justify the search for small molecules that might inhibit VRK1. Also, VRK1 may one day serve as a biomarker of aggressive cancers, which could thus inform oncologists as they decide on more advanced or conservative courses of treatment.
Traktman and Mon stress the importance of keeping their minds open as they conduct their research. “You can go into research with one model and be completely wrong, and it can actually turn out more interesting than you think,” said Traktman. “It’s a lesson for letting the data take you down the road to an interesting finding.”
Source: Read Full Article